Michigan Preview: Penn State

The regular season is upon us. Unfortunately for Michigan, they face a stiff first test in the form of future Big Ten Conference foe Penn State. The Nittany Lions are playing a CAA schedule this year, but are ineligible for the league tournament and automatic bid, so they’re basically an independent.

Penn State

Penn State Nittany Lions Lacrosse

Fear the Nittany Lion!

1 p.m. EST
Feb. 8, 2013
Holuba Hall. University Park, Pa.
Tickets are FREE
Live stats
@UMichLacrosse. @PennStateMLax.
Michigan pregame notes.
Penn State pregame notes. .pdf notes.

Tempo-Free Profile

The TempoFreeLax.com numbers displayed here are adjusted for strength of schedule, and are obviously last year’s figures, given that this is the first game of the young season. The Nittany Lions played the No. 23 schedule in the land last year, so they built these numbers by playing above-average competition.

Penn State 2013
Pace 64.00 (46)
Poss% 53.81 (5)
Off. Eff. 31.08 (24)
Def. Eff. 25.08 (7)
Pyth% 75.72 (6)

Jeff Tambroni has had a reputation as something of a slowdown coach, so considering that he had the personnel to dominate possession last year, it’s refreshing to see a team that didn’t play that slowly. Faceoffs were great, and the clear was outstanding.

The offense was hit-or-miss for Penn State last year. While they did play against some really good teams (and a top-half offense is really nothing to sneeze at for a non-power program), it was the one area where there was definitely room for improvement.

Where there wasn’t a whole lot of room for improvement was defense (wait until later, where I’ll predict that it gets better anyway!). Penn State was an elite team, and that’s even giving up double-digit goals on five different occasions. Four of those came in the first five games of the year, so they really locked down until the season finale.

Penn State was the No. 6 overall team last year, with the expectation of winning three-quarters of their games against average competition. They did win exactly that number against a slightly better-than-average slate, but they still have reason to be disappointed: They went 0-3 in one-goal games (and their other loss was only by two goals). If they can do a better job finishing this year, the Nittany Lions should be extremely good.

Offense

Last year’s Penn State offense was a reminder of the reasons we can’t assume the players who contributed will be the same from one year to the next. Specifically, T.J. Sanders was one of the country’s best attackmen last year. While Penn State lost Jack Forster from the top position of the scoresheet, Sanders – a lethal finisher with 44 goals and just five assists – should be able to add to his game to both score and set up others this year.

Senior attack Shane Sturgis should be even more of a distributor this year than he was last (27 goals with 17 assists), to allow the Nittany Lions to continue taking advantage of Sanders’ abilities.

The key offensive player outside of those two will be senior midfielder Tom LaCrosse, who had 23 goals and five assists last year. He’s a 5-10, 180-pounder, so not a big intimidating midfielder, but has the shot to keep defenses stretched out and open opportunities for his attackmen.

One of the big keys for Penn State will be to either find ways to continue scoring without assists (which they did last year, so it may not be that tough), or get someone to step up as a true distributor. Without seeing PSU on the field yet this spring, I would bet on players such as Sanders who had previously been exclusive finishers to become a little more well rounded.

Defense

This is where Penn State really made its hay last year, and where they may be even better this year.

Goalie Austin Kaut played all but 17 minutes between the pipes last year, and put up outstanding numbers with a .610 save percentage and just 7.37 goals against. Now a senior, he’s a consensus first-team all-america selection in the preseason to go along with All-CAA expectations. He’s also strong in the clear game, with just six turnovers all year. There’s a reason he’s the conference’s preseason player of the year.

Kaut didn’t do it on his own, of course. Senior defensemen Steven Bogert and Tyler Travis are both pre-season All-CAA selections, anchoring an all-around great defense. The third defenseman last year was J.P. Burnside, who is undoubtedly insulted to be the only close D starter not to earn all-conference honors in the preseason. Kessler Brown and Jack Donnelly play LSM.

Junior Michael Richards is the top short-stick defensive midfielder. Bogert, Donnelly, Richards, Tyler, and Burnside all had double-digit caused turnovers last year, but with an excellent goalkeeper, pressuring the opponent to force mistakes isn’t the focus of this defense.

Special Teams

The faceoff game is going to be a major question going into the year. Brother Rice alum Danny Henneghan was outstanding last year, but now that he’s graduated and moved on, the rest of the roster has a grand total of 10 attempts within the past year. Somebody who isn’t proven will have to take over. Poles Kessler Brown and Ryne Sternberg took two (both wins) and six (all losses), respectively last year, but it’s likely that a specialist who hasn’t played yet for the Nittany Lions becomes The Guy.

Penn State has a great clear, which you expect out of a team with good sticks. The entire defensive corps is very experienced, and Kaut certainly isn’t a liability in the clearing game, so expect another year of outstanding clearing. Moreso than a lot of other top teams, Penn State actually rode some opponents pretty hard last year (including an 18% fail rate from Michigan, though that was only slightly better than Penn State’s season average and about an average performance form Michigan). It’s certainly a trick they have in their bag, even if they don’t always emphasize it.

The Nittany Lions and opponents were about even in terms of penalties. They committed slightly fewer than the opposition, but for more time (which means more severe infractions, which could be something to watch). The conversion rates were virtually identical as well, so from top to bottom, this shouldn’t have a huge impact on the contest.

The Good Guys

Since I haven’t had a chance to give a full team preview to Michigan, a couple thoughts there. I do think the Wolverines are going to miss Gerald Logan in the goal this season. While Robbie Zonino is hardly going to be bad, Logan really is just that good. An experienced Michigan defense (albeit with lots of that experience coming at the MCLA level for the upperclassmen) will have to buckle down. The trend in that department is upward over the past couple years, so it’s totally possible.

Meanwhile on offense, Michigan has added firepower, and there’s a much deeper pool of talent on that side of the ball. Freshman Ian King is a star in the making, even if he has to play out of position at the left-hander spot in this one (until Will Meter comes back, which should happen shortly). Last year’s breakout stars were midfielders Kyle Jackson and Mike Hernandez, and a deeper attack unit – plus the addition of other talented middies such as freshman Mikie Schlosser – should really help there.

A healthy Brad Lott (he should be healthy by this point) is a really good faceoff guy, and though we don’t know anything about Penn State’s options – they haven’t played a lick at the dot – I think he can at the very least hold his own. What’s the biggest improvement there (aside from Lott’s experience in the Michigan system and with his wing players) will be depth. Kevin Wylie and Will Biagi have both shown the ability to spell Lott without being liabilities, or even take over if he struggles.

Big Picture

I think Michigan improved a lot more from Team Two to Team Three than they did in the first offseason of the program for a variety of reasons. Going from fifth-year seniors to freshmen was inevitably a dropoff (even if those freshmen had the talent to be better in the long run), and now those same freshman adding experience and mixing in with other Division-1 caliber players, rather than being thrown into the fire by themselves, will be much smoother.

That said, Penn State is really good. By the time you get to year three, there is hardly such a thing as a moral victory, but Penn State looks like an opponent that’s still well above Michigan’s head. Keeping this one close and showing signs of a bright future is probably a positive enough result.

Predictions

I’m torn on this one. I’d like to predict some positive results for Michigan, but the quality of opposition makes it tough.

  • I do think Lott will see some success on faceoffs (and if it’s not him, I think Biagi has the potential to the same). Penn State’s power in the past was due to the presence of a really good specialist, so while the system certainly helps, you don’t just replace Danny Henneghan and maintain that level of success.
  • Michigan’s defense showed some difficulty slowing down a finishing attackman last week against Tyler Melnyk (unfortunately a trend that’s continued from year one, though the defense overall has improved), so seeing T.J. Sanders – who scored four goals and notched an assist against Michigan last year – is pretty frightening. He should have a good game.
  • Michigan has added offensive talent, but Penn State’s defense is just too good for a few experienced players originally recruited to an MCLA team or lesser-experienced varsity recruits to really have a good day. Early-season struggles will compound it, and Michigan will struggle to score.

U-M kept this one closer than expected last year, and given the way the teams ended up finishing that season, the result was even more surprising. The Wolverines will come out with a chip on their shoulder for this contest, but that doesn’t count for any goals at last check. A strong Penn State D and a slow pace of play lead to a comfortable win, though not a blowout on the scoreboard. Penn State 12, Michigan 7.

Share your predictions, discussion, etc. in the comments.

Posted in division 1, previews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Michigan Preview: Penn State

Scores and Schedule: Feb. 7, 2014

Missed a scrimmage yesterday. Getting the early-season jitters out. Scrimmage action continues today.

Yesterday’s Scores

D-3/Club Women

Albion 15, Michigan State 11

Today’s Schedule

Division-1 Women

Detroit @ Ohio State, 7p.m.

Division-3 Men

Calvin v. Carthage, 11 a.m. @ Ultimate Soccer Pontiac
Albion v. Carthage, 8 p.m. @ Detroit Country Day

MCLA

Michigan State @ Grand Valley State, 7 p.m. (scrimmage)
Saginaw Valley @ Central Michigan, 8 p.m. (scrimmage)

Corrections, omissions, etc. always appreciated in the comments.

Posted in division 1, division 3, mcla, wcla | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Scores and Schedule: Feb. 7, 2014

First look: Detroit other opponents

I ran down Michigan and Detroit’s common opponents last week, and since the season approaches, here are the Titans’ other squads on this year’s docket.

VMI

Virginia Military Institute Keydets Lacrosse

The VMI team name is the Keydets, a Southern style slang for the word “cadets”.

Detroit: March 1 (away)

2013

1-12 (1-5 MAAC), #62 Laxpower, #63 Tempo-Free Lax

VMI was awful last season, winning but a single game against Manhattan (the Jaspers would go on to upset Marist the following week, which, what?). They’re in a new conference this year, but I wouldn’t count on them making huge strides as a program.

The Past Results

The Titans beat VMI in an 11-6 win at Titan Field last year that was more dominant than it looks on the final scoreboard. Detroit led 6-1 at halftime and let off the gas a bit after the break, playing basically the entire active roster.

Alex Maini and Tom Masterson each had two goals and two assists, Damien Hicks won 11 of 15 faceoffs, and Jamie Hebden caused an impressive seven turnovers.

The Forward-Thinking Look Back

VMI
Pace 76.38 (2)
Poss% 46.63 (58)
Off. Eff. 18.92 (63)
Def. Eff. 38.78 (61)
Pyth% 6.64 (63)

The VMI offense was the country’s worst last year, and by a pretty healthy margin – nearly three goals per 100 possessions. I’m betting things won’t get a whole lot better with the top two scorers from last year, Russell East and Bernie Mowbray, no longer around. Junior attack Mike DeBlasio and his 12 goals and five assists are back, along with enormous (6-6, 205) sophomore midfielder Gage Snowbarger with his 10 and three. That’s every single returning double-digit point earner. Brutal.

The defense was better than the offense, but still really bad. This means it’s good to lose the starting goalie, right? The only returner who saw a shot last year is junior Evan Windisch, who saved barely more than a third of shots faced (albeit on only 14 shots). Fortunately, LSM Tyler Prasnicki, who led the team with 26 caused turnovers, is back. Close D Taylor Jenkins is not, but senior Rory Jenkins will try to help shore things up a bit. This defense might actually get worse, unless some young guys step up.

After several years of being good at faceoffs and nothing else, VMI was even terrible on draws last year, coming in No. 50 in the country. In what is a theme with this team, top option Gaston Ledford… has graduated. No. 2 option Scott Frizzell… has graduated. The only returning player with more than a couple attempts is LSM Patrick Hine, who won just five of 23 last year.

Wagner

Wagner Seahawks Lacrosse Logo

Logo: Fierce. Team: Usually not as fierce.

Detroit: March 8 (away)

2013

1-12 (0-5 NEC), #63 LaxPower, #62 Tempo-Free Lax

Hey, so Wagner was the only team with a legitimate claim to being worse than VMI – though they did beat the Keydets in a class of the non-titans (no pun intended). This should be another opportunity for UDM to pad the win column.

The Past Results

Detroit beat Wagner 14-7 in 2010. That was a much worse Titans team than the program we see today, and probably a comparable Wagner squad.

A couple Titans from that game – Tylers Staruch and Corcoran – are still on the squad. Corcoran went 1/5 on faceoffs while Staruch had a goal and an assist.

The Forward-Thinking Look Back

Wagner 2013
Pace 67.15 (30)
Poss% 43.30 (63)
Off. Eff. 26.53 (51)
Def. Eff. 41.45 (63)
Pyth% 9.80 (62)

Wagner was mind-numbingly bad at possessing the ball last year – nearly an entire percentage point worse than the second-worst team in that regard. It’s probably a bad thing that the most-used (and by far best, though he was the only one with enough attempts to know for sure) faceoff man is gone in Krey Keller. Sophomore Paul DeVita id the only other guy who’s really had a chance, but with how bad the whole unit was lat year, new guys might get a chance. It’s also worth noting that, while the clear was very bad (per expectations when looking at an unskilled team), Wagner rode opponents very hard, putting together the No. 10 national unit in that regard.

Since the defense was really bad, it’s important to note that it might improve slightly. Goalie Nick Gibaldi (who faced tons of shots last year) is back, and actually didn’t put up numbers that are as depressing as you’d expect, given the heat. Defenseman Nick Beyer is back for his junior year after starting most of last year’s games, as is classmate Nick Bunting. Wagner has to replace R.J. DeRosa on a pole, but that’s not as daunting a task as replacing even more of those guys. There’s nowhere to go but up (literally so, when it comes to the national rankings).

Wagner’s offense last year actually wasn’t that bad. The SeaHawks lost leading scorer Colin O’Rourke, but a nice nucleus of twin sophomore attackmen Reed and Griffen LeClaire, junior attackman David DeCirce, and junior midfielder Cory Santor is back. Another year of experience for those guys should result in a decent offense, all things considered.

Marquette

Marquette Golden Eagles Lacrosse logo

Not many good Marquette lacrosse logos available on the internet :/

Detroit: March 15 (home)

2013

5 -8, #52 LaxPower, #55 Tempo-Free Lax

The first season for Marquette probably went quite a bit better than expected, with five wins under the Golden Eagles’ belts (including one over Detroit, about which more in a moment). That included quite a bit of luck, however, with a .357 win percentage, compared to the expected value of .228 that the data spit out for us.

The Past Results

Marquette’s first-ever home game was a victory over Detroit, just a couple days after the emotional letdown of the Titans’ canceled game against Michigan. The Golden Eagles used a 6-2 run in the third quarter to take a commanding lead in the 14-9 win.

Mike Birney and Alex Maini had three goals apiece, though it took them 10 and seven shots, respectively, to get there. The problem for Detroit was defense, where backup keeper Chris Kelly couldn’t channel A.J. Levell behind the high-pressure UDM defense (though the Titans went away from pressure to their doom in the contest), allowing 14 goals and making only nine saves.

The Forward-Thinking Look Back

Marquette 2013
Pace 66.07 (34)
Poss% 47.78 (52)
Off. Eff. 27.79 (46)
Def. Eff. 37.70 (58)
Pyth% 22.79 (55)

I just previewed Marquette for their scrimmage against Michigan, so I’ll keep this brief.

The offense was pretty good for a first-year squad, and attackman Tyler Melnyk is the straw that stirs the drink. He scored approximately 700 goals in the Michigan scrimmage last weekend, so if you give him opportunities, he’ll take them.

On the other side of the ball, Marquette was quite a bit worse, more in the range you’d expect for a new program. The defense struggled (a lot) against Michigan despite playing starters almost throughout, but given that the Golden Eagles return almost everyone from last year, some strides over the course of the season can be expected.

Canisius

Canisius College Griffins Lacrosse

Fear the Griffin!

Detroit: March 23 (away)

2013

3-10 (2-4 MAAC), #57 LaxPower, #56 Tempo-Free Lax

Canisius beat both teams that finished behind them in the MAAC, along with non-conference opponent Binghamton, but it was tough sledding outside of that. The Griffins were not expected to be quite that bad, so we’ll see if a rebound year is in store.

The Past Results

Detroit’s must-win regular season finale came against Canisius, and the Titans knocked the Golden Griffins out of contention for the MAAC Tournament (which was hosted in Buffalo by… Canisius. Harsh). UDM led 7-1 after the first quarter, and though Canisius fought back with a 3-0 run in the second, Detroit slammed the door in the third en route to a comfortable 13-7 win.

Detroit had a balanced scoring effort with three three-point scorers (Mike Birney with two and one, Alex Maini and Brandon Beauregard with one and two apiece), and 11 different players getting on the scoreboard in one way or another.

The Forward-Thinking Look Back

Canisius 2013
Pace 61.00 (57)
Poss% 51.20 (20)
Off. Eff. 24.04 (61)
Def. Eff. 38.31 (59)
Pyth% 21.49 (56)

This is the first of the Detroit-only opponents thus far that was legitimately good at anything. Mike Moran was a simply dominant faceoff specialist, spearheading the No. 6 group in the land… so naturally he has graduated. The players behind him weren’t bad by any stretch, but when your team is clinging onto something as a strength, you don’t want it to suddenly become an unknown.

The leading scorer last year was actually the second most-deploy faceoff specialist in midfielder Tim Edwards. The junior will try to continue where he left off last year, while potentially picking up a bigger load on draws. Attack Vince Gravino impressed as a freshman last year, and will likely improve from the No. 3 scorer in year two on-campus. Four of the top five scorers are back, so don’t be surprised if more experience means improvement from this unit.

Junior Alex Govenettio will return in goal, and though his numbers were borderline ugly, he faced some of the tougher offenses on Canisius’s schedule (though thankfully not Albany), and could improve by simple luck in who he’s running up against. Defensemen Dylan Knopfke, Adam Donner, and Rich Stapleton (who only took over a starting position midway through the year) all return, so there’s plenty of upside here.

Quinnipiac

Quinnipiac Bobcats Lacrosse

This bobcat is looking extra-fierce

Detroit: March 29 (home)

2013

6-8 (3-2 NEC), #53 LaxPower, #42 Tempo-Free Lax

Quinnipiac makes the shift from the NEC into the MAAC this year, going from one poor conference to another. The most interesting thing I see about last year’s Bobcats is the wildly differing opinions by LaxPower and Tempo-Free Lax (and I don’t know how LaxPower’s formula works to explain it).

The Past Results

Detroit was one of Quinnipiac’s early-season victims last year (unfortunately before the Titans rounded into form and the Bobcats fell apart). Alex Maini and Shayne Adams both scored two goals, with Maini adding an assist in the 9-5 loss.

This was around the time that Detroit starting upping its caused turnover numbers after starting the year on a much lower pace than previous seasons. Jordan Houtby had six CTs on his own, but Quinnipiac’s Jake Hayes went off with three goals and three assists, accounting for enough scoring to beat Detroit on his own.

The Forward-Thinking Look Back

Quinnipiac 2013
Pace 60.29 (60)
Poss% 50.24 (29)
Off. Eff. 31.90 (19)
Def. Eff. 37.23 (56)
Pyth% 38.95 (42)

This may just be me acting like a stat-homer here, but looking at the stat components, I see the profile of a team much more like the No. 42 squad nationally like TFL says than the No. 53 LaxPower thinks Quinnipiac was last season. They had an easy schedule, but were only truly bad at one thing: defense.

So let’s talk about that D, where senior Gill Conners will try to improve the unit. The Bobcats lose all of two starts (Sean Damboise and Dorian Wolff, who I assume just started the senior day game since each of them only totaled four appearances last season). With senior J.B. Marston, sophomore Chris Kendall, and junior Greg Pendergast used to working with each other, I expect a big leap from this unit.

West Islip attackman Michael Sagl went nuts last year, with 25 goals and 26 assists to account for more than a fifth of his team’s total scoring during his sophomore year. He’s the key guy on this offense, but classmate Pat Corcoran, a midfielder (and as far as I can tell, no relation to UDM’s Tyler), put together a 28-point year of his own. The player with whom he tied for second on the list, Basil Kostaras, and No. 4 scorer Brendan Wilbur are both gone, however. This is a junior-dominated returning group, with Matt Diehl in the midfield as well. Outside of Kostaras and Wilbur, most of a dominant (in its cohort, at least) offense is back, so this could be another good year.

Marist

Marist Red Foxes Lacrosse

RAWR!

Detroit: April 5 (home)

2013

10-4 (5-1 MACC). #33 LaxPower, #20 Tempo-Free Lax

Marist was the class of the league last year, and Detroit’s MAAC semifinal win really was a stunner at the time it happened. The Red Foxes had to be extremely disappointed with their season ending the way it did.

The Past Results

Detroit split its games with Marist last year. The regular-season contest was an 11-8 win for Marist in Poughkeepsie (one of the closest games Marist had all year, which I guess could have helped foreshadow the MAAC Tournament upset). Mike Birney had two goals and an assist and Tom Masterson had two goals.

In the MAAC Tournament, the Titans played a much slower game. It was a 68-possession outing with 13 total goals, for a combined efficiency of an ugly 19.11. Detroit got three goals from Mike Birney (this was when his hot streak hit full stride), and three assists from Scott Drummond. A.J. Levell was ridiculous with 17 saves and only six goals allowed in the 7-6 Titan victory.

The Forward-Thinking Look Back

Marist 2013
Pace 69.29 (18)
Poss% 52.68 (8)
Off. Eff. 30.61 (25)
Def. Eff. 29.62 (26)
Pyth% 60.68 (20)

It’s a bit easier to put up good numbers against the No. 61 schedule in the nation, but even adjusted for opponents, Marist was good. Possession was their strong point, but top faceoff specialist Matt Dugan graduated, and No. 2 option Dominic Montemurro was well below .500. More important to the possession success was ridiculously good clearing and riding, something that’s philosophical and shouldn’t see too much dropoff.

The offense, on the other hand, could go off a cliff unless the Red Foxes can find a way to replace Connor Rice and Jack Doherty. They combined for 94 points, more than a third of the team’s entire production. Sophomore attack Joseph Radin had a strong debut as a freshman, and midfielder Drew Nesmith should take a step up as a junior (with the shots available to him now since Rice and Doherty are gone), but I don’t think this will be a top-30 O nationally.

Goalie Dave Scarcello is back, and he had very nice numbers last year. Defensemen Ethan Fox (Fox named Fooooooooox), T.J. McDermott, and Patrick Wall, however, all graduate after combining for every start last season. It’s clear this year should see a big dropoff for Marist, and they really wasted their prime opportunity for the NCAA Tournament last year.

Siena

Siena Saints Lacrosse

“Saints” as in “Saint Bernards,” rather than “canonized people.” I can dig it.

Detroit: April 12 (home)

2013

8-9 (4-2 MAAC), #37 LaxPower, #32 Tempo-Free Lax

Siena was the MAAC’s second-best team last year by a wide margin ahead of No. 3 Jacksonville (now a member of the A-Sun), so the Titans really did go through a murderer’s row in the conference tournament. The Saints were probably licking their chops after the UDM upset over Canisius, but fell to the same fate.

The Past Results

The regular-season game last year was a 13-10 win for Siena in Loudonville (tough break for Detroit to play the league’s top three teams on the road in the regular season, all of them close losses). Alex Maini and Scott Drummond both recorded hat tricks wihile adding an assist. The defense was non-stout, causing only eight turnovers while opening AJ Levell up for 22 shots on goal.

In the tournament game, the defense wasn’t a whole lot better, but the offense was significantly more fun because Mike Birney went ham (five goals on 13(!!!) shots, just about all of them from distance). Alex Maini also had two and one, while Scott Drummond had a pair of goals on ten shots. I’m pretty sure the coaches just said “screw it, put the ball on cage as much as possible.”

Also of note, Damien Hicks held his own against a good Siena FO unit, at least enough for the clear/ride game to tilt possession in Detroit’s favor.

The Forward-Thinking Look Back

Siena 2013
Pace 71.06 (6)
Poss% 51.32 (18)
Off. Eff. 29.40 (37)
Def. Eff. 31.59 (35)
Pyth% 48.53 (32)

Siena played really fast lacrosse last year, which is fun. They were above-average in possession, thanks to Casey Dowd, who took almost every faceoff and was really good at them. He’s just going to be a junior this year, so expect more of the same, and possibly even a bit of improvement.

Siena’s offense was good-not-great last year, and was actually a pretty significant dropoff from the previous season. Expect the Saints to reload with the top four scorers returning. Junior midfielder Conor Prunty brings back 31 goals and 19 assists, while redshirt junior attack Richie Hurley was only one goal behind him production-wise. Senior attack Colin Clive and junior midfielder Nate Barry round out the top four. No. 5 Danny Martinsen is gone, but he’s the only departure from the top 10 of last year’s team. Reloaded.

The defense, on the other hand, doesn’t get off to such a good start, with goalie Matt Sharp out the door. Gone too are defensemen Mike Generi, Joe Ednie, and Erik Casparius. While Mike Battaglia (LSM) and Jake Kissick are back, those are significant losses throughout the defensive corps.

Manhattan

Manhattan Jaspers Lacrosse

Jasper: Far more scary if you’re a dalmatian. Disney jokes.

Detroit: April 19 (away)

2013

4-11 (1-5 MAAC), #61 LaxPower, #59 Tempo-Free Lax

Manhattan was one of the country’s worst teams until the season finale against Marist, which was a 14-12 upset. That improved them to… still one of the worst teams in the country. Them’s the ropes.

The Past Results

Detroit had a pretty easy go in the only matchup last year, building a 5-1 lead and not letting the Jaspers get any closer than three goals once it reached 6-3. Although UDM never had that single back-breaking moment to put it away once and for all, the 14-8 margin says enough about the difference between the squads.

Mike Birney scored four goals and chipped in an assist, while Tom Masterson and Andy Hebden each had a pair of goals (plus an assist for Masterson). A.J. Levell faced 18 shots and saved 10 of them, while Jamie Hebden led the D with four CTs.

The Forward-Thinking Look Back

Manhattan 2013
Pace 61.07 (56)
Poss% 44.21 (62)
Off. Eff. 27.44 (48)
Def. Eff. 36.45 (54)
Pyth% 16.79 (59)

Manhattan tried a ton of guys on faceoffs last year, but no individual could crack the .440 mark. Sean McMahon was by far the most-used, followed by Matt Ruquet. They were the worst on the team, but I would still expect that the returner McMahon gets his chance to win the job. Fellow senior Greg Smith didn’t blow anyone away either, and unless some new blood comes in, the struggle could continue.

The offense was a relative strong suit last year, and although leading scorer Tyler Jarvis has graduated, the rest of the top five is back. Finding some assists will be a big priority, since the only true assist man (No. 5 scorer Brett Madarazs) will take on a bigger role and his midfielder spot is not always the most natural for assisting, and this offense was extremely light on assisted goals in the first place. Attack Ryan Payton and midfielders Marcel Godino, Patrick Hodapp, and Madarasz are all seniors, so if nothing else there’s a lot of experience here.

This is the first team of the post that didn’t have a true No. 1 keeper last year, instead splitting time between Michael Wiatrak (just over nine games’ worth of time between the pipes in 10 appearances) and Rich Akapnitis (about seven games’ worth in eight appearances). Akapnitis had the worse save percentage but the better GAA, so maybe his defenders like him more. He’s a senior this year, and Wiatrak is a junior.

Junior Max Kerber and senior Dan McGreevey are the key returners on close D, and a rotating cast of characters earned the third start of the unit next to them during last season. Finding a third player to be “the guy” could help solidify the defense to a degree and lead to some major improvement for the Jaspers.

Monmouth

Monmouth Hawks lacrosse logo

A rare photo of the Monmouth mascot mid-magic trick.

Detroit: April 26 (away)

This will be the first year of Monmouth’s program, so there’s not any past evidence to build a basis on them. the general picture is that new programs are sort of terrible until a couple years in, so this should be a victory for a Detroit squad that has its feet firmly under it (and is gunning for an NCAA Tournament berth for the second year in a row).

The Hawks feature a number of JuCo and small-college transfers on the roster, but nobody who cam in from a different Division-1 institution. With just nine non-freshman on the roster and nobody who has an established reputation at the D-1 level, this could be pretty rough for a couple years until the squad grows up a bit.

Stay tuned in coming days, when I’ll run down the rest of the schedules for each team, and then get into full-on season previewin’ mode.

Posted in division 1, previews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on First look: Detroit other opponents

The Next Level: Feb. 4, 2014

Our weekly look at Michigan natives who are playing college lacrosse at division-1 institutions this spring…

Delaware 10, High Point 3

  • Junior midfielder Bennett Packer (Brother Rice) – Did not see game action.

As always, feel free to share corrections, additions, or stats from other divisions in the comments.

Posted in division 1 | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Next Level: Feb. 4, 2014

Michigan 18, Marquette 9

David McCormack Michigan Wolverines Lacrosse Marquette Golden Eagles

David McCormack scores in the third quarter

Since this was not an official game, there are no official stats (and therefore no Tempo-Free breakdown). However, there was still plenty to learn about Michigan from a relatively dominating performance against Marquette.

Notes

We’ll start in goal, where it’s clear that, while Robbie Zonino is capable, he’s also not going to steal as many goals as Gerald Logan did last year. Fortunately for Michigan, Zonino is used to bigtime games – as you’d expect coming out of Conestoga.

“Zonino really is a gamer,” Michigan coach John Paul said. “You come to practice and you might think, ‘man, these guys may be in trouble.’ He’s played this way now in both the games we’ve had him in… He’s used to playing in high-pressure games, he saw shooters in high school that were as good as he saw on the field today. He’s used to this, and I don’t think anything fazed him today. He was great.”

Without official stats, it’s tough to say just how good his performance was, but I definitely got the feeling that he let in a softie or two (and his frustration was evident a couple times).

On to scoring, where I’ll just run down the whole list, since there’s no official box score.

  • Jr. A Andrew Portnoy: 4G, 1A.
  • Fr. A Ian King: 3G, 1A
  • Jr. A David McCormack: 2G, 2A
  • So. M Kyle Jackson: 2G, 1A
  • Jr. A Mike Francia: 1G, 2A
  • Sr. M Doug Bryant: 1G, 1A
  • Fr. M Mikie Schlosser, Sr. M Thomas Paras, So. M David Joseph, So. M Riley Kennedy, Fr. A Andrew Roswell: 1G
  • So. M Mike Hernandez, Jr. FO Kevin Wylie, So. M Dan Kinek: 1A

The performance of King was big, especially since he was playing out of position at lefty attack, since junior Will Meter missed the game.

“We have really high hopes for Ian, and he pretty much missed the fall with mono, so he’s really just come on in the last three weeks or so,” Paul said. “We’re just starting to see in practice what he can become. We saw a little bit of it today, he’s pretty special. Ian will be on the field [when Meter returns]. We don’t have a lefty on the field at attack right now. King can play both hands, but he’s a righty. He’ll get over to the right side, Meter will take the lefty side.”

That means Portnoy, Francia, and McCormack will be fighting for the third starting spot. The offense was potent (without full stats I can’t be sure, but Paul said 18 goals on 31 opportunities, which would be blistering – I don’t think Michigan calculates opportunities the same way I do at TFL, though).

The one big scary point was a huge second-quarter run by Marquette, which even bled a little bit into the third quarter as well. U-M had a 7-1 lead entering the second quarter, and the Golden Eagles outscored them 6-1 to enter the halftime break down just a goal, then added the first two of the second half to earn their first lead of the game.

Of course, Michigan closed strong with the final ten goals of the game to earn a comfortable win. The second-quarter run felt like it was on account of possession, and Paul confirmed that in the postgame. Michigan failed five clears, leading to several unsettled opportunities (which were cashed in by Marquette attack Tyler Melnyk, who scored six of Marquette’s seven fist-half goals). The Wolverines also struggled on draws during the quarter.

“We were 5/10 clearing the ball, we couldn’t win a faceoff,” Paul explained. “We had four penalties, two of them we gave to them on the faceoff. Possessions, that’s really what it comes down to. We were playing a freshman faceoff guy [Brian Archer], and he didn’t handle adversity very well. That’s a lesson for him, he knows.

“These guys needed a reminder about how important some of the little things are, and they got away from some of the little things. Clearing the ball is easy. In fact, we were perfect clearing the ball today other than that quarter. Stop making dumb mistakes and we’ll be fine, and that’s what they did.”

Speaking of faceoffs, Michigan rotated through three specialists (not including start Brad Lott, who was out with injury but should return for the Penn State game Saturday). Freshman Will Biagi played the first and fourth quarters, and I unofficially have him winning six of 14 draws (though he won the clamp on a couple and the wings weren’t there for a GB). Archer’s second-quarter performance was only a 3/8 mark – not that bad – but as Paul mentioned, he had a couple penalties for violations (and gave up some 6-on-5 opportunities both through those and through giving up clean wins). Kevin Wylie was an outstanding 6/8 in the third, and also had an assist on a clean win.

“Brian Archer didn’t have a good second quarter but I really liked what Biagi and Wylie did,” Paul said. “We didn’t have Brad Lott today, who’s going to be the starter at that position, and to see the backups come in and do that well, I was pretty happy with that. I think those two things stood out to me.”

When Lott comes back, he should start. He’s the best they have, but there are more bullets in the chamber than there were last year, a very positive development.

Injuries. The program has already announced that goalie Gerald Logan would miss the whole year, but I think it was new information that sophomore defenseman Charlie Keady would be out for the duration of the year, as well. Other than those two, the whole team is expected to return in short order (just about all contributors other than Meter for this wekend’s game, by the sounds of things). Defense is where Michigan can’t afford any more injuries.

“We’re deep at attack, we’re deep on offense,” Paul said. “We’re not as deep defensively, and that’s where werre going to have to make sure we stay healthy.”

 J.D. Johnson, Chris Walker, and Mack Gembis started on defense for Michigan, with Paxton Moore playing at LSM on defense (but oddly not on the wings for faceoffs, where Chase Brown was on the top unit).

The Other Guys. I wasn’t paying the utmost attention, but I didn’t see much action from either of Marquette’s Michigan natives. Attack Henry Nelson barely played (if at all), and fellow Brother Rice alum K.C. Kennedy was not one of the top couple faceoff guys.

Photos

I’m transitioning to Flickr for photos right now, and I’m too simple to figure out how to embed a slideshow. Here’s a link to the set, for now.

Up Next

Penn State is going to be a significantly bigger challenge than Marquette, particularly in the transition from preseason to regular-season action. U-M travels to take on the Nittany Lions in State College Saturday.

Posted in division 1 | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Scores and Schedule: Feb. 4, 2014

No games today, but a couple scrimmag scores of note from yesterday…

Yesterday’s Scores

Division-1 Men

Detroit 12, Albion 4
Detroit 8, Michigan State 3

Division-3 Men

Albion 4, Detroit 12
Albion 10, Michigan State 4

MCLA-1

Michigan State 3, Detroit 8
Michigan State 4, Albion 10

Corrections, omissions, etc. always appreciated in the comments.

Posted in division 1, division 3, mcla | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Scores and Schedule: Feb. 4, 2014

Scores and Schedule: Feb. 3, 2014

Rounding up yesterday’s scores and today’s upcoming games…

Yesterday’s Scores

Division-1 Men

Detroit @ Notre Dame (non-scoring scrimmage)

Today’s Schedule

Division-1 Men

Detroit v. Albion, 11 a.m. (Ultimate Soccer Arenas Pontiac)
Detroit v. Hill Academy (Ont.), 11 a.m. Update: Detroit v. Michigan State

Division-3 Men

Albion v. Detroit, 11 a.m. (Ultimate Soccer Arenas Pontiac)

MCLA-1

Michigan State v. Detroit

Corrections, omissions, etc. always appreciated in the comments.

Posted in division 1, division 3, mcla | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Detroit scrimmage preview: Notre Dame

Detroit gets its scrimmage on today, taking on the last team it played in a meaningful game. Here’s to hoping it’s half as exciting this time around.

Notre Dame

Notre Dame Fighting Irish Lacrosse Logo

Classic stick design

Noon p.m. EST
Feb. 2, 2014
South Bend, Ind.
Free Admission

Tempo-Free Profile

Neither Michigan nor Detroit plays Notre Dame in the regular season (oddly, if you ask me), so this is the last we’ll see of the Irish this year, pending a potential  rematch in the NCAA tournament. The TempoFreeLax.com numbers displayed here are last season’s adjusted for strength of schedule. Notre Dame played the eighth-toughest schedule in the country last year, so they put this up against pretty good teams (and the raw numbers wouldn’t look quite as pretty). For comparison’s sake, Detroit played a bottom-10 schedule, and that’s despite games against No. 9 Ohio State and No. 16 Notre Dame. The rest of it was bad, yo. This year, things won’t get a whole lot easier with a shift (alongside Syracuse) to the ACC.

Notre Dame 2013
Pace 65.63 (41)
Poss% 49.43 (38)
Off. Eff. 30.60 (26)
Def. Eff. 23.30 (2)
Pyth% 68.45 (16)

The computers didn’t like Notre Dame as much as the humans did, given that the NCAA Tournament committee named the Irish the No. 2 seed in the NCAA Tournament, while Tempo-Free Lax (and LaxPower, for that matter), had them in a range where they were one of the last bubble teams. Viva la RPI instead of computer measures that actually make sense (and name recognition. Also very important, evidently).

Anyway, Notre Dame’s strong suit last season was – no surprise, since they’ve built their identity on it in recent years – a very strong defense. They played pretty slowly, typically wanting to settle into the half-field, but as we saw in the NCAA comeback over Detroit, they had the ability to get out and ride to get back into a game.

The offense was good-but-pedestrian. The Irish could score, but with the defense they were trotting out, didn’t need to a whole lot. They did put up double-digit goals ten times (twice in losses), but also couldn’t get past four in a couple blowouts to Syracuse.

The possession game was somewhat poor for Notre Dame (a surprise, based on the defense-and-slow-play identity). They faced off pretty well – but were nothing special – and cleared very well. They just didn’t care one white for riding except in the Detroit game.

The Team

For a defense-first team, it’s only fair to start out on that side of the ball. Outstanding goalie John Kemp played all but 12 minutes of last season’s action, saving .539 of shots faced and allowing 8.19 goals per game. He has graduated, leaving a trio of unproven options. I would guess junior Conor Kelly – who got those other 12 minutes of action last year – is your guy.

The defense, however, returns its most important pieces. Seniros Brian Buglione and Stephen O’Hara put up double-digit caused turnovers last year (the only two to do it for the Irish, on a team that didn’t play much of a takeaway style), and while Matt Miller is gone, returning two senior options is nice. Starting LSM Matt Landis was just a freshman last season, so with a year of experience under his belt, he should also be able to help the new addition to the defensive corps develop. SSDM Jack near was the only other player (who was not a faceoff specialist) to get a ton of GBs last year – I suspect one of the two faceoff guys pulled full-time double-duty, but that’s just my guess from looking at the stats.

Speaking of those faceoff guys, Liam O’Connor took most of the draws last year, and was the best on the squad (only above .500). He did miss six games, so if he’d been in the whole season, the Irish might have been a bit better in the possession game. Nick Ossello wasn’t bad by any stretch, but he was just average (literally, with a .500 mark on the nose). The third man in was Trevor Brosco, who took less than a third of either of the other guys, and won them at a .489 clip. All three of those guys return.

The Notre Dame offense should be more potent than it was last year. The 2013 Irish were relying on a freshman (attack Matt Kavanaugh), and now that he’s a year into the system, they should be more comfortable running through him wire-to-wire. While second-leading scorer Sean Rogers has graduated, Conor Doyle, Jim Marlatt, and John Scioscia return, so the majority of the offense is intact. The Irish will have to plug people (and it sounds like freshman Brother Rice alum Sergio Perkovic is likely to be one) in to replace those who have moved on, but it should be relatively plug-and-play.

One note that’s not really all that relevant to a pre-season scrimmage: I’m used to seeing huge chunks of missing games (due to injury or whatever other reason) on teams’ cumulative stat pages, but Notre Dame was frighteningly healthy last year. Aside from the aforementioned FOGO switches (and they don’t consider their faceoff guy a starter anyway), they lost all of two(!) starts last year, both by Conor Doyle. In the other 14 games, they ran out the same lineup, so that speaks to an unnatural level of consistency, and something I wouldn’t expect to continue this year.

With their personnel losses (namely Kemp) and the likelihood that they get more banged up at some point this season than they were last year, I could see a bit of a slide from the Irish – but not too much.

Big Picture

Detroit has already scrimmage Notre Dame once since the NCAA Tournament thriller, so this isn’t exactly a revenge match or anything. Still, it’s a chance for the Titans to test themselves against the best opponent they’ll see all year. There is no Ohio State or Notre Dame on the docket this year, so this should more-than prepare them for the Marquettes and Sienas of the world.

Predictions

It was clear from last scrimmage that the NCAA Tournament game was something of a fluke (not that it takes away from what it was – that’s why we love sports – its just not super-useful for predictive purposes going forward). With a Detroit team that’s likely to go through an identity change and a Notre Dame team that seems poised to simply reload just about everywhere except goalie, this is a growing experience, not a realistic scrimmage win.

  • Detroit’s style is going to be unlike what we’ve seen in previous years. The goalie play and takeaway defenders won’t be there for the aggressive style, and they’ll go a bit more conventional, at least to start the year. We’ve seen them move in this direction a couple times in the past before snapping back to the aggressive play when it didn’t work out, so a little bit of run at each style is probably for the best.
  • On the other end of the field, the Titans will be able to score. Alex Maini got a lesson in being “the guy” last spring, and while we’ve seen difficulty integrating that guy back into a more well-rounded lineup in the past, the Titans should be able to do it. There’s more firepower, with a presumably healthy Shayne Adams joining him on attack, and of course Mike Birney gunning it from the midfield.
  • I think Detroit should be a pretty good faceoff team this year, after Damien Hicks showed some real talent there midway through last year, and with other options on the board as well. Notre Dame was just OK on draws, so this will be a good learning opportunity.

The format – and personnel implementation – of a scrimmage is always a mystery until the end of the thing, so making predictions is usually fruitless. I think Notre Dame is going to be about the same quality as last year, and while Detroit is likely to round into form again, they have an adjusting period to go through. Detroit falls, 14-7.

Share your predictions, discussion, etc. in the comments.

Posted in division 1, previews | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Scores and Schedule: Feb. 2, 2014

Rounding up yesterday’s scores and today’s upcoming games…

Yesterday’s Scores

Division-1 Men

Michigan 18, Marquette 9
Michigan 3, Denison 7

Today’s Schedule

Division-1 Men

Detroit @ Notre Dame, Noon.

Corrections, omissions, etc. always appreciated in the comments.

Posted in division 1 | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Scores and Schedule: Feb. 2, 2014

Scores and Schedule: Feb. 1, 2013

The first day of the spring is here. Division-1 scrimmage. Gamechanger.

Today’s Schedule

Division-1 Men

Michigan v. Marquette, 1 p.m. – Preview
Michigan v. Denison, 4:30 p.m.

Corrections, omissions, etc. always appreciated in the comments.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Scores and Schedule: Feb. 1, 2013