Detroit Preview: Robert Morris

First win over an in-state rival in program history? Sounds like fun. Now turn around and play one of the sport’s perennial powers a couple days later. Cool? Cool.

Robert Morris

Robert Morris Colonials Lacrosse Roster

Robert Morris signed the Declaration of Independence. Also: looked nothing like this picture.

Feb. 23, 2014. 1 p.m. EST
Moon Township, Pa.
Live Stats. Video Stream.
@DetroitTitans. @RobertMorrisLax.
Detroit game preview. Gameday Central. .pdf notes.
Robert Morris game preview.

Tempo-Free Profile

The TempoFreeLax.com numbers displayed here are last year’s figures, probably for the second-to-last weekend this year (in a couple weeks, there should be enough data for this year’s digits to be relevant, and hopefully we’ll have worked out all the kinks in retrieving stats from the NCAA’s glitchy website). They are also adjusted for strength of schedule, in which Robert Morris was dinged due to playing in the bad NEC.

Robert Morris 2013
Pace 70.20 (12)
Poss% 46.91 (55)
Off. Eff. 33.17 (16)
Def. Eff. 29.39 (25)
Pyth% 49.79 (31)

Overall, Robert Morris was just about a dead-center team last year. They finished nationally right at that number in pythagorean win expectation, though the components had some variation to them.

The main thing RMU was bad at last year was possessing the ball. They had the second-worst faceoff unit nationally, and though the clear (No. 22 nationally) and ride (No. 34) were middle-of-the-pack, it wasn’t enough to make up for really poor possession.

The Colonials were actually pretty darn good on offense, failing to reach double-digits just five times in 15 games (two of them wins anyway). Even though they didn’t get the ball a whole lot, they knew what to do with it.

The defense was just above-average, even though it looks worse in non-tempo-adjusted terms. Robert Morris was able to hold off a relatively weak offensive slate.

That pace, however, was pretty fast. RMU was just outside the top ten, and that includes some wild variations. They played two of the slowest games of the year (56 possessions in wins over Quinnipiac and Jacksonville), and some really fast ones (80 possessions just a couple days later in a Quinnipiac rematch, 82 in a win over UMBC).

Offense

The offense is off to a less impressive start than its season performance last year (with a small sample size, to be fair). The Colonials scored seven in a 73-possession (still fast, no worries there) loss to Bellarmine.

Personnel losses were pretty serious in the offseason. Eric Rankel is back (that’s the leading scorer from last season, and he was only a freshman), but Jake Hayes, Dave Morton, Tyler Digby, and Connor Martin are not. That’s scorers 2-4 and No. 7 on the list, some big losses.

Though he didn’t lead the way against Bellarmine (1G 1A on seven shots), expect Rankel to be The Guy this year. The starting attack is rounded out by sophomore Luke Laszkiewicz and freshman Cody Nass, both Canadians (this is a pretty Canuck-heavy squad, not unlike Detroit). Like most players on the roster, Laszkiewicz and Ranekl were but about 2/3 goals, 1/3 assists in their production. Junior Jacob Ruest should factor in heavily, given how important he was to the team last year. He was half-and-half goals/assists.

The starting midfield against Bellarmine was freshman JonPatrik Kealey, sophomore James Rahe (both Canadians), and redshirt senior Taylor Graves. Though it’s a little more rare, Graves was your assisting midfielder last year, the only player with appreciable production to have more helpers than finishes. Kealey and Rahe were the leading scorers against Bellarmine with three points a pop.

Defense

The defense took a stride forward in game one (once again, sample size issues abound there), holding the Knights to 10 goals on 37 possessions – but, like, not doing enough to win the game so whatever.

Juniors Luc Magnan and Joe Scenna are returning starters from last year’s defense. Magnan didn’t start against Bellarmine, but played significantly. Tyler Rankel played mostly LSM last year but got the start on defense, along with redshirt junior Alex Kelly, who missed last season. This was a Detroit-style defense last year, going out to force plenty of turnovers. With more experience, look for that to continue. Given Detroit’s sloppy game against Michigan, it could be effective this afternoon.

Brian Bohn was last year’s most-deployed backup goalie, but that meant he got a grand total of 20 minutes all year, saving three shots and letting three by him. He was good against Bellarmine, making 15 saves and allowing 10 goals.

Special Teams

Bobby Mo was terrible on faceoffs last year, with primary specialists Nick Beaudoin and Tyler Rankel (as noted above, an LSM, so they were probably conceding faceoffs most of the year) not even sniffing .400 on the season. Redshirt sophomore Chris Barney sat out last season, and one must assume it was due to injury, because he appears to be competent on draws. He won 15 of 21 in the first game, picking up 12 of his own ground balls. Look for this to be a strength of Robert Morris’ team over the course of the season.

Robert Morris was a pretty good clearing team last year, and unless the goalie is a liability there, the experience (and Canadian stick skills) on defense and in the midfield should see them continue that performance. The Colonials were just about in the dead center nationally in opponent clearing, which probably means they didn’t ride hard a whole lot.

Last year’s team, on account of that aggressive defense, was very penalty-prone. It seems like something that will continue, so while Detroit has moved away (slightly) from that style of defense, Robert Morris seems to be doubling down. The man-down defense was pretty good (opponents were .260), which I guess makes sense given the amount of in-game practice they got. RMU’s EMO was really good, though, finishing over 50%.

Big Picture

Michigan came out a bit flat against Johns Hopkins yesterday, on the heels of an emotional in-state battle Wednesday night. I think Detroit might do a bit of the same. Even though they have one more day to get their minds right, they also came up on the wrong end Wednesday, so it takes a bit longer to get over.

That said, this is another rivalry game for Detroit, and one that they’ve never won. The Titans are 0-4 against Robert Morris, and will look to change that today. RMU looks to be slightly worse than last year’s team, but it remains to be seen just how much Detroit will drop off with their own personnel losses.

Predictions

On a standard week of preparation, I think I would like Detroit in this one. They have some pieces that really match up well with RMU. However, just a couple days of practice, a road trip, the emotional letdown… it should be a grind.

  • The teams are about even on faceoffs. It seems like Robert Morris will be pretty good at the dot this year, but I’m still really high on Damien Hicks even though he struggled last week. Detroit’s wing play doesn’t have Jordan Houtby anymore, but there’s a physical presence that should help intimidate and assist in picking up the ground balls.
  • Detroit’s looking pretty turnover-prone on offense this year, and against a team that thrives on creating pressure, I think that could be an issue. While many of Michigan’s forced turnovers were on the ride and I don’t expect Robert Morris to ride that hard, UDM has plenty to clean up.
  • Look for more than one Titan goalie to play if things don’t go well. Coach Matt Holtz mentioned Wednesday that Jason Weber is going to compete at the position, so even if Connor Flynn starts, I think he’ll get time.
  • Robert Morris is still finding itself offensively, and a softer defensive scheme than Detroit has run in the past seems to be the better path to slowing down the O. That’s a perfect fit for the transition the Titans are going through.
  • This should be a fast game, even if Detroit isn’t pushing the tempo as much as in the past. Look for 70-plus possessions.

As noted above, the emotional and preparation factors make this a tough contest for Detroit, especially since Robert Morris is built pretty differently from Mercer and Michigan. While they will certainly come to compete, Detroit can’t quite pull off the win, falling 12-9.

Share your predictions, discussion, etc. in the comments.

Posted in division 1, previews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Detroit Preview: Robert Morris

Scores and Schedule: Feb 23, 2014

Last night’s scheduled game between Michigan and Oakland was wiped from every schedule I’ve seen, but some teams are back in action today.

Yesterday’s Results

Division-1 Men

Michigan 5, Johns Hopkins 14.

Division-1 Women

Michigan 7, Villanova 20

Division-3 Men

Albion 11, Aurora 9
Alma 11, Thiel 12
Calvin 2, Benedictine 14

Collegiate Club Men

Michigan-Dearborn 7, St. Louis University 8

Collegiate Club Women

Grand Valley State (Club) 19, Wayne State 2

Today’s Schedule

Division-1 Men

Detroit @ Robert Morris, 1 p.m. Preview.

Division-3 Women

Alma @ Puget Sound

Collegiate Club Men

Michigan-Dearborn @ Lindenwood-Belleville
Davenport v. George Washington @ Washington, Pa.

Corrections, omissions, etc. always appreciated in the comments.

Posted in division 1, division 3, mcla, wcla | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Scores and Schedule: Feb 23, 2014

Scores and Schedule: Feb. 22, 2014

Last night’s scheduled game between Michigan and Oakland was wiped from every schedule I’ve seen, but some teams are back in action today.

Yesterday’s Results

Collegiate Club Men

Davenport 14, Pittsburgh 1

Collegiate Club Women

Michigan 23, Western Michigan 2

Today’s Schedule

Division-1 Men

Michigan @ Johns Hopkins, noon. Preview and streaming information.

Division-1 Women

Michigan @ Villanova, noon. Stream.

Division-3 Men

Albion v. Aurora, 12:30 p.m. @ Ultimate Soccer Pontiac
Alma @ Thiel
Calvin @ Benedictine

Collegiate Club Men

Michigan-Dearborn @ St. Louis University

Collegiate Club Women

Wayne State @ Grand Valley State (Club)
Michigan-Flint @ Grand Valley State (Club)
Michigan-Flint v. Wayne State @ Grand Valley State

Corrections, omissions, etc. always appreciated in the comments.

Posted in division 1, division 3, mcla, wcla | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Scores and Schedule: Feb. 22, 2014

Michigan Preview: Johns Hopkins

First win over an in-state rival in program history? Sounds like fun. Now turn around and play one of the sport’s perennial powers a couple days later. Cool? Cool.

Johns Hopkins

Johns Hopkins Blue Jays lacrosse logo

The first bird-based mascot in the Big Ten.

Feb. 22 2014. Noon EST
Homewood Field
Live Stats. Video Stream (appears to be free).
@jhumenslacrosse, @UMichLacrosse
Michigan weekly notes. .pdf notes.
Johns Hopkins pregame notes. .pdf notes.
John Paul video preview.
Michigan Daily preview.

Tempo-Free Profile

The TempoFreeLax.com numbers displayed here are last year’s figures, probably for the second-to-last weekend this year (in a couple weeks, there should be enough data for this year’s digits to be relevant, and hopefully we’ll have worked out all the kinks in retrieving stats from the NCAA’s glitchy website). They are also adjusted for strength of schedule, in which Hopkins – 16th-toughest slate last year – did itself enough favors to make these all the more impressive.

Johns Hopkins 2013
Pace 68.64 (20)
Poss% 55.46 (2)
Off. Eff. 30.56 (27)
Def. Eff. 24.32 (4)
Pyth% 80.03 (2)

Hopkins was really good last year, and through some quirks (two one-goal losses, with three-, four-, and five-goal losses as well), they managed to lose enough games to anger the RPI gods and miss their first NCAA Tournament since time immemorial. They were a top-five team in the country and lost their auto-bid to an overrated Notre Dame team that almost got upset by a 15-seed in the first round.

Ending that rant, the Blue Jays have a reputation as a somewhat slow team, but they were actually well-above average last year. That’s thanks in part to a good ride, which, along with the second-best faceoff unit in the country, made the No. 2 in possession percentage.

As you’d expect with a defensive mind like Dave Pietramala, the Jays’ defense was extremely efficient last year. Teams had a lot of trouble scoring on Hopkins, and were pretty into not doing that.

The Hopkins offense was the only chink in the armor. It was still decent – better than most programs in the country – but when you’re Hopkins and you load up on talent, middle-of-the-pack won’t do it. Hopkins scored in the single digits in four of its five losses last year, and only reached 10 goals in the other. Change one of those results, and the tournament streak lives on (they also scored single-digit goals in two wins).

Offense

So, let’s look at that loaded offense, yeah?

The leading scorer from last year is junior attack Wells Stanwick, who was balanced in his output as a sophomore, but has 10 assists and just two goals so far this year. What’s interesting is that he’s adjusted his game despite fewer finishers around him. Fellow attack Brandon Benn is back (he had an astounding 34 goals to just one assist last year, and has six and one thus far in 2014), but Zach Palmer, John Ranagan, Lee Coppersmith, John Kaestner, and John Greeley are not – among offensive players alone, not counting the losses of D-mids and faceoff specialists who also scored. That’s a whole lot gone.

Sophomore Ryan Brown is the third starter at attack, while Connor Reed and Rob Guida man starting midfield positions. Freshman John Crawley and sophomore Holden Cattoni have scored more than either of those two on the year, so there’s likely a greater emphasis on defense for at least one of them. Given Guida’s reputation as an offensive player, I’m betting it’s Reed.

This is an attack-oriented unit, with the three starters the top three scorers to date on the year. Stanwick has been your true feeder, while just about everyone else is more goal-heavy than assist-heavy. Slowing him down is clearly not easy, but it does go a ways toward slowing down the Hopkins offense writ large.

Defense

Eric Schneider has started both games in goal (and gone all but just over a minute this season between the pipes). He sat for three years behind Pierce Bassett, and has performed well in his step into primetime. He’s only giving up 7.5 goals per game in the Jays’ two contests, and is saving .568 of shots faced. Michigan doesn’t have a Jesse King like Ohio State does, so beating Schneider will be a tough task.

Jack Reilly is a returning senior from last year’s squad, but Chris Lightner and Tucker Durkin are both gone, meaning there’s not a ton of starting experience. Juniors John Kelly and Robert Enright have been around for a while though, so they’re not exactly spring chickens. LSM Michael Pellegrino is a returning starter at that position, and was the team’s non-faceoff leader in ground balls last year.

With the losses from the starting unit last year, expect a step backward, but not a serious one. Pellegrino’s return is a key one, and it remains to be seen just how good Schneider will be over the course of the year. Michigan might not be the team to test him, though.

Special Teams

Hopkins has been great on faceoffs the past three years, but loses its exceptional specialist in Mike Poppleton (.685 last season). The Jays have gone with Drew Kennedy this year, and hey! He’s been even better. With an admittedly small sample size (maybe Ohio State and Towson both stink at faceoffs – the Buckeyes were good last year but Towson was one spot away from dead last nationally), he’s won .756 so far this year. Part of that is wing play, but it’s clear Kennedy is pretty good himself. Backup Craig Madarasz has won two of five attempts.

Hopkins has been a heavier-riding team than you expect out of power programs nowadays, which I tend to like. They were No. 17 nationally last year, but alas, opponents are clearing 40/43 so far this year. In fact, Hopkins has been pretty bad in clearing itself, not what you’d expect from a team that basically has its choice among the best stickhandlers in the country on the recruiting trail. Ohio State rode them to a 17/21 performance, which isn’t that bad in the grand scheme. Seems like just a sample size thing.

The Jays have scored twice in six man-up opportunities, while holding opposing EMOs scoreless in the same number of chances. They’ll likely improve the former number over the course of the year, while the latter is as good as it gets. They play a pretty clean brand of lacrosse, so the extra-man probably won’t come into significant play tomorrow.

Big Picture

Michigan got what it needed with this week’s win over Detroit. The Wolverines have a multi-win season for the first time ever, are over .500 for the first time ever, and have as many positive vibes as they have in the program’s varsity history.

On a short turnaround, I don’t think they’re expecting to give Hopkins much of a game, but that doesn’t mean they’ll fold, either. Last year’s game between the teams was a pretty good result (though the Jays let off the gas, if we’re being honest with ourselves) for that stage of Michigan’s program. Hopkins doesn’t strike me as being quite as good as last year, while Michigan is night-and-day better.

Another scoring margin in the same range won’t be bad, as long as U-M does so in a more competitive fashion: no seven-goal run for Hopkins in the first quarter.

Predictions

I think, given the emotional game the other night, lack of time to prepare, and simple strength of opponent, this will be a tough game for Michigan. That’ll happen for another couple years.

  • I’ve been sold on Brad Lott as a faceoff specialist from the beginning, and I think he’ll have a great performance. Lott will win about 50% of the clamps on faceoffs, but his win percentage will be significantly lower due to wing play. We saw Wednesday that he won just about every clamp, but the team only got possession on 75% of them (which is still, like, really good). Look for a .400 mark.
  • Michigan’s difficulties defensively have had more to do with one scoring attackman over the three years of the program. An offense based around a distributor at attack is a different story, but Hopkins has enough weapons that they’ll be able to fill the net.
  • I think Robbie Zonino will be a good goalie at Michigan, but the talent at Hopkins will be too much to handle in this one. Hopkins is shooting just .258 on the year to date, but they’ll crack .400 in this one.
  • I’m unsure what to expect out of Michigan’s offense. It’s safe-ish to say they’re actually pretty good at this point in the year, but “actually pretty good” isn’t going to get it done against a very good Hopkins D.

Both teams have their share of runs, but Michigan’s are more two-goal compared to Hopkins’ four-goal (or more). The Wolverines look like they belong on the same field as the Blue Jays, an upgrade from last year’s “they aren’t any good but I can see potential for the future.” Still, Hopkins get a possession advantage and the offense and defense are too good to let Michigan keep this one that close. Michigan falls on the road, 16-9.

Share your predictions, discussion, etc. in the comments.

Posted in division 1, previews | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Michigan 14, Detroit 13 (OT)

This was one of the most thrilling games I’ve seen either team perform in. The only thing that really comes to mind is each of Detroit’s final three games last year, and I only got to see Notre Dame in person. Unfortunately, one team had to lose this contest.

Michigan Wolverines Detroit Titans Lacrosse Brad Lott Damien Hicks

Brad Lott (Michigan) and Damien Hicks (Detroit) take the opening faceoff.

Tempo Free

From the official box score, a look at the tempo-free stats:

The Game 2014
Michigan Detroit
Faceoff Wins 23 Faceoff Wins 8
Clearing 13-15 Clearing 22-28
Possessions 44 Possessions 38
Goals 14 Goals 13
Offensive Efficiency .318 Offensive Efficiency .342

This was a relatively fast game, per my expectations in the preview stories yesterday, and featured a lot of up-and-down excitement.

Michigan’s efficiency wasn’t nearly to the level of Detroit’s in the contest, but dominance on faceoffs (and on the ride) helped the Wolverines not only keep it close but come away with a win.

Notes

We’ll start right there, on faceoffs. Michigan’s Brad Lott missed the first two U-M games, and while the Mercer contest was just fine without him (U-M lost the faceoff battle but drew even in possessions and dominated in possession), the Penn State game could have looked significantly more respectable with an even performance on draws – more like a 19-8 gam – and moreso if Lott had been able to win the battle outright in Happy Valley.

“Brad’s progressing very very quickly,” said Michigan coach John Paul. “It really shows: last year he didn’t have a fall to prepare. This year’s he’s prepared all year. He had an awesome summer, he came back in shape, and kind of changed everything about his life and his diet. It’s showing, and if he wants to be a great faceoff guy, it’s showing.”

Part of what I’m trying to say here is that I’m not worried about UDM’s Damien Hicks (1/5 before getting pulled) or Tyler Corcoran (0/4). I think Lott is going to be one of the country’s best faceoff guys in time. Jordan Yono performed better than either specialist, and I do think that the FOGOs would have been able to see similar success, since much of Yono’s success came with great help from his wings. Detroit should be fine against lesser faceoff specialists.

“I’ve got to give a ton of credit to Jordan Yono, who stepped in,” said UDM coach Matt Holtz. “He was the difference-maker to kind of swing it back. I think we were down by five at one point. The difference was when he went out there and started taking faceoffs – he took the rest of them the rest of the way – that kind of really swung everything back in our direction.”

Offensively, there was a lot of talent on the field, as expected. Both offenses were good-not-great, though some of that was due to Michigan’s ride (six lost UDM possessions without getting into the box). There were several big plays. First among the highlight-reel opportunities was Mike Birney’s shot from 25 yards out with just a couple second left in the third quarter, giving Detroit a two-goal lead.

“When push comes to shove and you get to the end of quarters and you get the end of halves and you’ve got to make a play, you think ‘players’ not ‘plays,'” said Holtz. “When it’s on, the goalies aren’t saving it. He’s either missing the cage, hitting the goalie, or it’s in. That’s tough to defend against, and he got one in there. If I had to pick anybody in the country to shoot with two seconds left in the quarter, I’d take Mike.”

That highlight was ultimately overshadowed by Michigan’s Kyle Jackson nothing the overtime game-winner. Game-winning goals are pretty much always going to be the biggest moment in a game, particularly in OT. Jackson had a somewhat rough day otherwise (a turnover and only hitting three of his 11 shots), so that ended it with a good taste in his mouth.

“It felt great, considering it was probably one of the worst games I ever played,” he said. “I had a lot of turnovers, and it was just nice that one dropped for me, because it was a struggling day.

“I just kept fighting through it. I do it all the time in practice. It was more of just a mental thing for me, trying to strive through it. I was just lucky that shot at the end went through. It was a nice pass from Mike Hernandez, and I just got lucky I was wide open.”

Paul was quietly begging for Jackson to do what he was coached to do: avoid the goalie’s stick side.

“I like seeing KJ ten yards out right in front of the goal, no question,” he said with a laugh. “We were shooting a lot after the first period to the goalie’s stick side, and he was saving them. I was saying ‘please shoot the scout, please shoot the scout.’ I don’t even know if he did or not, but that’s what I was saying.”

Michigan’s Ian King tied a program record with four goals (a feat that has been achieved twice by sophomore Mike Hernandez, once by fifth-year senior Thomas Paras, and was achieved in the squad’s first varsity year by Trevor Yealy).

“He was just very, very consistent,” Paul said. He had some open looks he would love to have buried, too. He hit some pipes in the first half, and missed a couple shots that were wide open in the second half – a couple EMO shots that were open for him that he missed. We’ve got to dial that in for him, we’ve got to shoot better. King is going to get his shots. He finds a way to get his shots.”

“I was pretty confident,” King added. “The team, we prepare well for these games, and honestly they set me up for those shots. It wasn’t anything I did, it was ball movement and the team set me up to succeed like that.

“It’s pretty awesome. I never thought I’d have the opportunity to do something like this.”

Detroit’s Alex Maini had a strong performance in a losing effort, with three goals and two assists. Scott Drummond (2G, 2A) and Mike Birney (3G) joined him atop the Titans’ scoresheet, but it was a lot of the intangible output that really made Maini’s game special, even in a loss.

“That’s why he got picked by this team as a captain: he’s a leader, he’s a little bit unconvetional,” Holtz said. “He plays bigger than himself, he plays stronger than himself. It’s one of these strange things when usually you ask players to play within themselves, but sometimes he steps outside of himself and does a little bit more than you’d ever expect.”

The defenses made some plays themselves, too. Detroit’s Connor Flynn handily won the goalie battle. Michigan launched almost half-again as many shots as the Titans, and five more on goal. Flynn let in a soft one early, but was strong during the rest of the contest.

Michigan’s Robbie Zonino started the game strong, but faltered (particularly during the 5-1 third quarter for Detroit) over the course of it. His effort was good enough to win this one, but at this point in his career he’s not going to go out and win games.

Elsewhere

Detroit recap. Box score. Matt Holtz postgame interview. Detroit photo gallery. Michigan recap. Michigan photo gallery. U-M postgame celebration. My photos.

Up Next

Michigan immediately hits the road to take on perennial power Johns Hopkins tomorrow.

“We have two days – quick turnaround – to prepare for Hopkins, which in some ways maybe for us right now is better,” Paul said. “We don’t have a lot of preparation, just go out there and play them. We need to keep looking for areas every single day, how we handle this when we get home, how our practice goes tomorrow, every single area of our program has to get better, and that’s really all we’re looking for. It doesn’t matter who we’re playing, we’ve got to come back and have a great practice tomorrow, because nothing’s easy.”

Meanwhile, Detroit takes on Robert Morris in Pittsburgh Sunday.

“We’ve got a rivalry game, another one coming right up,” Holtz said. “Robert Morris is a close team that we play a lot. I think we’ve got to go back, we’re going to take a day off tomorrow – we haven’t had a day off yet this week – we’ll take tomorrow off, take a breather, take a break, get our legs under us, get some ice on our bruises, and start on Friday getting ready to go on Sunday.”

Trying to crank out preview materials for both of those games ASAP.

Posted in division 1 | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Scores and Schedule: Feb. 21, 2014

Last night’s scheduled game between Michigan and Oakland was wiped from every schedule I’ve seen, but some teams are back in action today.

Today’s Schedule

Collegiate Club Men

Davenport @ Pittsburgh

Collegiate Club Women

Michigan @ Western Michigan

Corrections, omissions, etc. always appreciated in the comments.

Posted in mcla, wcla | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Michigan beats Detroit: Game photos

Mostly from the beginning and after the game, because I wanted to spend the game, you know, watching it. Actual written content coming a little later today.

Detroit Titans lacrose Drew Schupbach

Drew Schupbach (who would later go on to score his first collegiate goal) shows of slick shooting shirts for the Titans.

Detroit Titans lacrosse Damie Danseglio

Goalie Damie Danseglio warms up, though Connor Flynn would start the game and go the distance for the Titans.

Detroit Titans lacrosse Shannen Wesley

Sophomore midfielder Shannen Wesley fires on cage in warmups.

Michigan Wolverines Detroit Titans Lacrosse Brad Lott Damien Hicks

Brad Lott (Michigan) and Damien Hicks (Detroit) take the opening faceoff.

Michigan Wolverines lacrosse Ian King

Michigan’s Ian King opens the scoring with the first of his four goals.

Detroit Titans lacrosse Tom Masterson

Tom Masterson makes a pass from the wing.

Detroit Titans lacrosse Andy Hebden

Sophomore midfielder Andy Hebden gets Detroit on the board.

Detroit Titans Matt Holtz Michigan Wolverines John Paul lacrosse

Head coaches shake hands at the conclusion of the contest.

Michigan Wolverines lacrosse

The Wolverines get a standing ovation from fans as they leave the field.

As always, if you want a high-res version of one of these photos (i.e. you’re a player or parent or huge fan), just shoot me a quick e-mail at t.w.sullivan1@gmail.com.

Posted in division 1 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Scores and Schedule: Feb. 20, 2014

Michigan takes the in-state battle for the first time in two-and-a-half tries, while the school’s club women dominate a regional opponent. Oakland hosts the club Wolverines tonight.

Yesterday’s Scores

Division-1 Men

Michigan 14, Detroit 13 (OT)

Collegiate Club Women

Michigan 20, Bowling Green 1

Today’s Schedule

Collegiate Club Women

Oakland v. Michigan, 8:45 p.m. @ Detroit Country Day

Corrections, omissions, etc. always appreciated in the comments.

Posted in division 1, wcla | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Scores and Schedule: Feb. 20, 2014

The Preview: roundup and predictions

Michigan tries to get up off the mat after a demoralizing loss to Penn State, while Detroit tries to unveil a (slightly) different program identity and begin 2014 with a bang. Both programs welcome Mercer to Southeast Michigan for indoor games.

Michigan v. Detroit

Feb. 19 2014: 7 p.m. EST
Ultimate Soccer Arenas Pontiac
Directions. Ticket Information.
Live stats @UMichLacrosse. @DetroitTitans. @GreatLaxState

Preview Posts Roundup

Overview and Predictions

This is a big game for both squads, even more than it means something from a bragging rights perspective. Michigan has a chance for its first-ever multi-win season, while Detroit has a shot at its first winning record since March 24, 2012, when the Titans moved to 5-4 with a win over Marist.

I also think this is going to be an offense-dominated game. Both teams have new goalies behind defenses that either have a history of struggle or a history of being high school players and nothing else yet. On the other side, the offenses both have some serious firepower, and this could be a bit of an up-and-down game.

How much Detroit’s struggle against Mercer was an anomaly/first-game-jitters/rust-shaking experience will be the key in this one. Michigan made Mercer look like a high school team, and Detroit clearly didn’t. If the Titans were playing below their level (or Michigan above their own), that’s what will make this an even contest. Otherwise, it seems like Michigan takes it pretty handily.

  • If Brad Lott plays for Michigan, the Wolverines win about 55% of faceoffs. If not, the Titans win about 60%. 
  • Both goalies will have save percentages hovering around .500. The keeper who faces fewer shots will likely be the one to get the win. These aren’t goalies who are going to steal wins for their teams (yet, at least), though whoever makes a couple saves early could get enough confidence to make an impact.
  • Both defensive midfields do a better job shutting down the opposing offensive midfield than the close D does of shutting down the attack. However, Michigan’s more versatile midfield helps make the difference there.

I think this one will be close, certainly closer than the common opponent would lead one to believe after just glancing at the results. Most of the intangibles seem to favor Detroit, the way I see it, and that’s another equalizer. Still, this looks like the year where Michigan’s talent will really start to show on the field thanks to (finally) having some experience. Wolverines win, 13-11.

Share your predictions, discussion, etc. in the comments.

Posted in division 1, previews | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The Preview: Common opponent, advanced stats, miscellanea

Michigan Wolverines Detroit Titans Lacrosse

it’s here 🙂

In anticipation of tonight’s big in-state battle, let’s take a look at the unit matchups piece-by-piece. Penultimate peril: the other stuff

Common Opponent

Michigan and Detroit have both played one team already this year: the Mercer Bears. While both ended up winning, they did so in very different fashions. Michigan gave an early goal, then dominated the rest of the way. Detroit had to score three of the final four goals to escape with a 1-goal win.

How much can we count upon one game apiece to tell us the whole story of each team? In all honesty, not a whole lot. The one takeaway that resonates is “close v. not close,” since Michigan looked like they didn’t belong on the same field as Mercer (the Bears might have been more at home down the street at Pioneer High School), whereas Detroit went toe-to-toe with them the whole way.

I do think that those two data points show something about both teams, even as it relates to their relative strength (and there is predictive value going forward). However, on any given day, that one data point per team can mean everything or nothing.

Did Detroit have a bad day against Mercer that won’t be replicated? Did Michigan have a great day against the Bears that won’t be replicated? Did both teams play to their potential, but it won’t matter at all in the head-to-head matchup? There’s no way to know.

Statistical Matchup

Since the year is so young – and the NCAA’s stats website so glitchy – the full tempo-free data on both squads doesn’t tell us much yet. Here is an example of how crazy the stats can be: with all three teams’ games accounted for, Mercer is ranked No. 33… just three spots behind a Michigan squad that beat them by 13 goals last weekend. Detroit is at No. 22, eight spots ahead of No. 30 Michigan.

Still, we can learn a little about the squads. Michigan’s first opponent, Penn State, is the No. 3 team in the country (without the Loyola result showing up, so that’s all on account of stomping Michigan).

Detroit is top-20 in both offense and defense at this early stage of the season, and slightly below average in possession percentage. Michigan’s offense is No. 12 nationally thanks to the carpet-bombing of Mercer, but the Wolverines boast the No. 40 defense, thanks to Penn State’s offensive explosion. U-M is just a couple spots behind Detroit in possession percentage.

As much as one common opponent doesn’t tell us much about the two teams, early-season stats (especially those adjusted for schedule) are similarly meaningless.

Intangibles

One refrain I’ve heard since the weekend is that Michigan’s preparation for Mercer (playing a regular-season game against Penn State) left them more ready for the Bears than Detroit’s (a couple non-D1 scrimmages). UDM had to shake of rust, while Michigan was ready to play. While that may be true, clearly the Titans didn’t have all the rust off by the end of game one, whereas Michigan seemed to be operating in peak condition by the end of game two. Michigan will have to maintain that form and Detroit will have to elevate its own to give us the game we’re expecting.

The two programs have gone about building in very different ways. Michigan is emphasizing the traditional lacrosse hotbeds – Baltimore, Long Island, Philadelphia – and the West, while cherry-picking in-state to get guys who fit what they want. UDM, on the other hand, looks very heavily in-state, while picking up other talent from Long Island and Ontario (particularly Eastern Ontario). In many ways, there’s an argument that the bragging rights game is as much about the homegrown v. mercenary roster as it is about who rules the state.

That said, the rivalry factor is big as well. We see it regularly in practically every sport (particularly at the college level): when rivals play, throw out the record books. While the two teams probably have slightly different mentalities about the nature of the rivalry (for reasons listed above), both value it, especially this early in the year. Whether one team will ultimately prove to be dominant or the two squads are evenly matched, the rivalry factor always injects an element of the unknown.

The venue brings with it some unique challenges. Of course, Ultimate Soccer Arenas is the early-season practice facility for the Titans, so they’re used to the sightlines and lighting on the field. They’ve also played a game there, and just a couple days ago. Michigan, on the other hand, won’t be as used to that particular venue, though they practice indoors at this time of year, as well. U-M’s practice field is a darker (slightly smaller) Oosterbaan Fieldhouse, so at the very least there will be an adjustment. Penn State had more to do with this than Holuba Hall, but the Wolverines’ lone game to date in an away stadium didn’t go so hot.

External Links

Lots of chatter about this one.

Part the final: Predictions and how to follow coming to GLS shortly.

Posted in division 1, previews | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Preview: Common opponent, advanced stats, miscellanea