Michigan’s spring schedule is here! With a few dates filled in thanks to our ability to assume things using our deductive reasoning:
Date | Opponent | Location |
---|---|---|
Jan. 31 | Marquette, Denison (Exh.) | Home (Oosterbaan) |
Feb. 7 | Bellarmine | Home (Oosterbaan) |
Feb. 14 | Detroit | Home (Oosterbaan) |
Feb. 21 | Notre Dame | Home (Oosterbaan) |
Feb. 28 | Canisius | Home (Oosterbaan) |
March 3 | Jacksonville | Away (Jacksonville, Fla.) |
March 8 | Brown | Home |
March 14 | St. Joseph’s | Away (Philadelphia) |
March 21 | Drexel | Home |
March 26-29 | Maryland | Away (College Park, Md.)* |
April 2-5 | Ohio State | Home* |
April 9-12 | Rutgers | Home* |
April 16-19 | Johns Hopkins | Away (Baltimore)* |
April 23-26 | Penn State | Home* |
April 30-May 2 | B1G Tournament | College Park, Md.* |
Interactive Whiteboards by PolyVision
Thoughts on thoughts on thoughts:
- It’s a lot of home games on the docket. Only four away games (two of them conference games), and a whopping four regular season games in Oosterbaan Fieldhouse – as best as I can recall, U-M has not played more than one per year in the first three seasons of the program. Oosterbaan was considered a big advantage during the club days, and although the varsity squad plays on a regulation-width field rather than the narrower football lines of the old days, it’s still an environment that not a lot of opposing teams are used to. That Bellarmine, Detroit, and Canisius are potentially winnable games, and will be played with a U-M advantage, that’s a boost to start the season.
- I included the Big Ten Tournament at the end there, but let’s be honest with ourselves here: a six-team conference means Michigan almost certainly has to win two games to make a four-team field (or win a nice little tiebreaker), and they’re probably another year from pulling that one off.
- Speaking of the conference schedule, the dates are still in flux (though the weekends appear to be set), thanks to – hopefully – the Big Ten Network’s ramping up of the sport’s coverage. According to Lacrosse Magazine, primetime Sunday games on BTN are in play… which means not a whole lot of Michigan action on Sundays, most likely (the Hopkins game should be on ESPNU, per the Blue Jays’ existing contract with that network). Either the Ohio State or Rutgers game should be prior to Michigan’s football spring game – more likely the latter contest, if my football spidey sense is accurate. In other things falling into the “hopeful, but unrealistic” category, maybe the U-M administration will finally realize it only makes sense to play the lacrosse game before the football practice, not after it.
- Michigan will play back-to-back Philly teams, one away and one at home. The Drexel matchup is particularly interesting, because U-M swiped Dragons offensive coordinator Conor Ford in the offseason. Drexel may be familiar with his schemes, but he’ll also be familiar with theirs – and their personnel. Nice little intrigue to the coaching chess match.
- The spring break trip is interesting in that it’s not as comprehensive as previous years, when two or three games would happen over the break. There’s no midweek game (there aren’t any on the schedule at all, actually), and even the start of spring break sees the Wolverines playing a home contest against Canisius, rather than getting their travel on.
I see about 6-ish winnable games (counting, say, Rutgers and Drexel for about half apiece), so this is a schedule at least as difficult as last year’s at the top. There’s not as much pulpy bottom to exploit, either. Michigan will have to take strides as a program to put together a record that looks like progress. Given the tough nature of Big Ten play, Michigan will take its lumps this year. They’ll also take some lumps in the non-conference (welcome home, Sergio Perkovic, please don’t score eight goals on us), but they should be able to win some games.
With Michigan moreso than other programs, it’s tough to know how much improvement to expect year-to-year, because the roster is still in the middle of transforming from a fully MCLA club talent base to a fully NCAA varsity recruited talent base. The third year of that transition (Team One wasn’t a transition at all) – but with yet another new offensive coordinator – should be the best yet.
I’m calling it right now. UofM will beat Drexel. OC Ford knowing the Dragons personnel outweighs them knowing his schemes. Home game for the Wolverines is an added advantage. Most importantly, Drexel graduated 2/3 of their starting attack and defense, as well as their top-scorer 2x All American midfielder. Overall, 6 wins on the low end…8 wins on the high side.
Drexel loses a ton (including Ford, who has been very successful in his career as an OC), but I’m not willing to pick the upset until I get a chance to look at both teams in some more depth.
I agree with CK, and I likewise am calling it right now: 7 wins for UM this year. I think Logan coming back will be huge as will the maturation of some of last year’s youngsters.
I think I agree with Tim, but I like the optimism and the early returns from fall ball make it look like a possibility. Drexel though should be tough. They had a freshman who put up 52 points last year (2nd in the country) at attack. Top attackmen have given Michigan trouble in the past. Hopefully this team puts in the work and takes a nice step forward this year.
I like the schedule. The only thing I don’t like is this is the third year in a row they are out at Hopkins, although I think last year’s game was originally scheduled for Ann Arbor and had to be moved because of a facility issue. At least the guys are used to playing at Homewood now. I guess I also don’t like that they are at both Hopkins and Maryland. Wouldn’t it have made more sense to split those so they weren’t traveling to the same spot twice in a season and then not at all the next year? I suppose that’s a Big Ten call.
There is one midweek game Tim. March 3 at Jacksonville is a Tuesday, no?
If this team has any hope at all of beating ND, playing the game in Oosterbaan provides it. Cornell can tell the Irish about that. Whether that game is competitive yet or not, it’s great to see them finally on the schedule. Hopefully that game will stay on the schedule.
Improvement can be measured by winning a game or two more than last year, but it can also be measured by competitiveness in every game, including the big ones. If this team is in most all games late, that’s actually a big step up. A dream season would be making the Big Ten tournament. I doubt anyone expects them to accomplish that, but I also doubt many expected them to make the ECAC tournament last year.
You’re totally right, and it’s directly in that spring break window that I thought it was odd to not see one. Big ol’ NEVER MIND on that one.