D-1 Re-Alignment

You may recall that I’ve touched on Division-1 conference affiliations in the past, and mentioned that there is a possibility that re-alignment could be a positive in terms of helping encourage more non-hotbed schools to add lacrosse (particularly those in Big Ten country).

Though last summer’s re-alignment seemed to be the end of any major shakeup in college athletics, it seems that this summer (continuing into the fall) has brought about a second wave. As of now, here are some of the possible changes to the D-1 landscape.

Syracuse and Pitt to the ACC

The Orange join the country’s top lacrosse conference, bringing the ACC to five teams (Duke, Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina are the others). That brings the ACC to just one member short of being an NCAA-sanctioned conference in lacrosse, autobid and all. Should somebody like Villanova join the ACC, there’s your six-team conference. But if the league doesn’t expands to include any more current lacrosse teams, it’s possible that an ACC football school, such as Florida State (or Boston College/NC State two schools that have shuttered D-1 programs in the recent past) could add the sport.

Pitt also happens to be a decent choice for adding D-1 lacrosse. They’re a public institution in a state that has good lacrosse talent. They have a natural rivalry with Penn State, there’s already a D-1 lacrosse program (Robert Morris) in the Pittsburgh area, and with an ACC affiliation, there are plenty of reasonable scheduling opportunities for non-conference games.

Syracuse out of the Big East

Syracuse’s departure drops the Big East to six teams – depending on timing – and back up to seven once Marquette joins in 2013. With at least one other school on shaky ground (the above-mentioned Villanova), the league may not continue as a lacrosse conference. Losing the most high-profile member in ‘Cuse certainly doesn’t help its case.

Could the dissolution of the Big East as a lacrosse conference (or possibly as a conference in any sense, per some scenarios) lead the westernmost members – Notre Dame and Marquette – into pushing for a rebirth of the GWLL?

The Ripple Effect

With the Big 12 seemingly on the verge of implosion, and the Big East not much more stable, there could be much wider-reaching ripples in conference alignment. Does the departure of Syracuse and Pitt make the Big East a less-attractive option for Notre Dame’s basketball teams (and non-revenue sports)? That could drive the Irish into all-sport independence, or even into the Big Ten, ACC, or Pac-12.

One hypothetical situation (fanciful though it may seem, conference re-alignment is a crazy time) sees Notre Dame and Texas end up in the Big Ten. The Irish would be the fourth lacrosse-playing member of the league, which could help inch some existing Big Ten schools ever-closer to taking the plunge themselves.

…AND?

Until we see what shakes out with Syracuse and Pitt, and what effects that will have on re-alignment from a football/basketball perspective (because let’s be honest here, those are the sports that matter, and for good rea$on), it’s impossible to predict what happens.

Like the summer of 2010, it’s possible that the enormous changes that seem imminent right now never come to pass. If they do though, their effect on the D-1 landscape in the midwest should be a very interesting study.

This entry was posted in division 1 and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to D-1 Re-Alignment

  1. Hap says:

    It will be ND and UConn. ND will be the 6th lax team. The ACC offers better demographics and exposure to alumni on the east coast. The ACC opens football recruiting in the mid atlantic and southeast(FL) . Also academically better fit than Big 10 with Duke, NC and UVA. This would be a huge move but the growth on the east coast and south east is more appealing than the declining midwest. NDs hands will be tied as the super conferences grow and it will not be able to schedule games against competitive teams. From a lax standpoint it would be incredible because every team could potentially make the tourney every year. Maybe UConn adds a mens team considering its in CT close to NJ and Long Island all strong recruiting areas.

  2. Alex says:

    Alright, explain this to me: Who goes on a site dedicated to covering a team they don’t like, which very few people actually read, just to bash that team and their conference?

    Explain another thing to me: Who claims the ACC is better academically than the B1G? Northwestern, Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois, Penn State… The ACC wishes it could do what the B1G does in terms of money, and it can’t even approach it in football prowess. I don’t see any league with more than a couple teams at the top, and then everyone else. The ACC has VT and FSU in a good year.

  3. Hap says:

    I know, isn’t the world wide web awesome! For me I always have to start with Bloomberg.com, WSJ.com, The Googles and then Great Lax State.com. I just love this internet. Thank God for Al Gore. On Ward!

  4. Big Ten homer says:

    I would say the ACC is generally superior academically to the Big Ten, at least at the top:

    Northwestern Duke
    Michigan (sucks) UVA, UNC
    Wisconsin, Illinois <<< Wake Forest, Georgia Tech, BC

    Clemson, FSU, Maryland, UCG, NCSU, and VaTech are all so-so which puts them roughly on par with IU, Iowa, MSU, Minnesota, UNL, tOSU, Penn St., Purdue. I don't care about your other points, but the academic point was wrong.

    Penn St.'s who you pick as the #5 academic school against the ACC's lineup? I'd put them around 10 or 11 with MSU.

Comments are closed.